Members of each the treasury and opposition benches on Sunday expressed doubt whether or not there's any conspiracy behind declaring the sixteenth modification to the constitution bootleg, reports wire service UNB.
The MPs alleged that a shot is on to make division between the judiciary and therefore the government. They additionally hoped that the apex court can rethink its judgment once the review petition is filed during this regard.
They gratingly criticised the Supreme Court (SC) finding that upheld the state supreme court judgment declaring the sixteenth modification to the Constitution bootleg.
The MPs additionally weakened heavily on amici curiae, as well as jurists Kamal Hossain and M Amir-ul Islam, appointed by the apex court, for putting 'untrue statements' before the court over the problem.
Jasod MP Moin Uddin Khan Badal initiated the talk taking floor within the House chaired by speaker Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury when the Maghrib recess.
Commerce minister Tofail Ahmed, agriculture minister Matia Chowdhury, data minister Hasanul Haq Inu, civil aviation and commercial enterprise minister Rashed Khan Menon, Jatiya Party MP Ziauddin Ahmed (Bablu), Awami League MP Arab chief Fazlul Karim Selim and faculty member Ali Ashraf, freelance MP Rustum Ali Faraji and BNF MP SM Abul Kamal Azad joined the talk.
Tofail Ahmed aforementioned individuals square measure sources of all power and this parliament is made with their mandate. "The cupboard is susceptible to parliament. we have a tendency to even will impeach the president, however cannot do therefore within the case of a specific space (judiciary)."
Mentioning that the court had annulled the fifth modification to the constitution, he questioned however the Supreme Judicial Council, that was introduced by military ruler Ziaur Rahman, will prevail.
Tofail gratingly criticised the amici curiae, oral communication they placed untrue statement before the court over the problem. "There isn't any single shred of truth in their statements," he aforementioned mentioning the names of Dr Kamal Hossain and lawyer Amir-ul Islam.
"We've no word to condemn those that advocated for scrapping the sixteenth modification. Their remarks do not match with what they'd aforementioned in 1972. they're currently terribly opportunists," he added.
Terming the SC finding 'a premature judgment', Inu aforementioned the court may have passed the decision when enactment of a law for the removal of justices in line of the sixteenth modification.
"The honorable court reviewed the sixteenth modification to the Constitution in motivated approach," he said.
Inu hoped that the court can rethink its judgment throughout the review, oral communication justices ought to be susceptible to Parliament like MPs and ministers.
Menon aforementioned a shot is on to make division between the judiciary and therefore the government.
Selim aforementioned the court itself desecrated the Constitution passing the judgment over the sixteenth modification to the Constitution.
"The judgment can ne'er be enforced if Parliament does not implement it," he added.
He aforementioned the justices don't have any right to try to to politics, however they're creating remarks in numerous programme on the far side their limits.
Bablu aforementioned the parliament had simply repaired the article ninety six of the 1972 constitution. "Parliament will impeach the president however not the persons UN agency square measure appointed by the president. will it go logically? Please restore the article ninety six within the constitution and respect the democracy," he added.
Badal aforementioned the court can have to be compelled to prove however the sixteenth modification challenged the fundamental structures of the constitution.
He additionally criticised the court for its 'disrespectful remarks' concerning MPs. "You hurled disrespectful words to the parliament."
On three Gregorian calendar month last, the Supreme Court (SC) passed the decision upholding the state supreme court judgment that declared the sixteenth modification to the Constitution bootleg.
No comments:
Post a Comment